Is classical music superficial? Yes, all that stuff about 'the timeless, about so-called higher feelings...but when it comes down to it (or in the moments when you're prepared to put the trappings to one side) isn't there something timeless about popular music..timeless in a different way?
Music wedded to a particular moment in time, a particular place; a stilled moment that stays the same as life moves on. And that music was part of your life, which is why you can always associate specific memories with it: regret and heartache and longing and desire, as they are actually experienced.
But, it might be said: does the intensity of an experience count for anything, especially if it is not related to attention to an 'object' of desire or understanding that is intrinsically superior, more refined, 'deeper', merit worthy? In a world that is given over to instantaneous and non-reflective pleasure isn't there a case to be made for objectivity, for 'standards' of judgement that cannot be reduced to an individual's desires? Isn't the classical something that stands the test of time, that stands, in some sense, against the corrosive influence of time?
Perhaps. But you're drawn to things that exist in time, in your time. That's what you can relate to. And there is often something terribly stuffy about European 'high culture'. Which is why Hollywood still trumps all that pretentious European high brow nonsense.
The time has come, you think, to speak in plain English. Music from the 80s. Yes! That's what we want...music that reflects time.
'Man has a responsibility to find himself where he is, in his own proper time and place, in the history to which he belongs.'
---Thomas Merton.
Music wedded to a particular moment in time, a particular place; a stilled moment that stays the same as life moves on. And that music was part of your life, which is why you can always associate specific memories with it: regret and heartache and longing and desire, as they are actually experienced.
But, it might be said: does the intensity of an experience count for anything, especially if it is not related to attention to an 'object' of desire or understanding that is intrinsically superior, more refined, 'deeper', merit worthy? In a world that is given over to instantaneous and non-reflective pleasure isn't there a case to be made for objectivity, for 'standards' of judgement that cannot be reduced to an individual's desires? Isn't the classical something that stands the test of time, that stands, in some sense, against the corrosive influence of time?
Perhaps. But you're drawn to things that exist in time, in your time. That's what you can relate to. And there is often something terribly stuffy about European 'high culture'. Which is why Hollywood still trumps all that pretentious European high brow nonsense.
The time has come, you think, to speak in plain English. Music from the 80s. Yes! That's what we want...music that reflects time.
'Man has a responsibility to find himself where he is, in his own proper time and place, in the history to which he belongs.'
---Thomas Merton.













