
The danger is that such a society, dazzled by the abundance of its own growing fertility and caught in the smooth functioning of a never-ending process, would no longer be able to realise its own futility-the futility of a life which does not fix or realize itself in any permanent subject which endures after its labour is past.
---Adam Smith, cited by Hannah Arendt
One cannot enjoy good states of mind unless things work.
--Skidelsky on Keynes.
~
That appeals to me, seems about right, just far enough on this side of worldliness. A certain type of Muslim sensibility here. No sufism for you, my friend. States of mind'? Possibly. A good life sounds better. A bourgeois ideal? Don't knock it. I think that's why 'suffering' as an ideal is something that makes your nerves twitch, why the current fashion for making a song and dance about one's "inner demons" and angst bores you. Likewise, ascetism and hedonism are too extreme, too cut-off from the world.
~
But yes, the world, bridges (Simone). How we need them! A good slice of luck, a dollop of kismet if you like -and some brown bread doesn't go amiss either.
~
Hollywood nearly always trumps Europe because its films do not represent ideas but embodies them in an entertaining spectacle. So, to talk about The Time Machine as if it were a film about class subordination and how one class is sustained by the other is to miss the point.
Anyway, it is not the subterranean Morlocks who are dominated but the Eloi who enjoy their moment in the sunshine, quite oblivious of the world around them or any of their compatriots. The problem is not that labour is constrained but that even the free life seems to be so utterly devoid of meaning that one wonders what joy can be had from it.
Capitalism and modernity work to destroy limits; both are an unending process, a life of continuous self-creation and production without any identifiable telos. Marx's utopia envisages a time and a place where labour has ceased to be a curse or a constraint since it has been liberated from want by the immense productive capacity of technology. But there is something very strange with this end of history since labour, which was once the source of all value, ceases to be of importance and politics is also abolished. What, under such circumstances , binds one person to the next? A life that is without contradiction and tension is hardly recognizable as a human life at all. A life that becomes too sweet, like one that becomes too bitter, fails to hold our attention and can barely be inscribed with any meaning: there is a retreat into the private realm, beyond good and evil.
At the end of history our problem is not that of an overbearing central authority, the straining to establish autonomy against constraining forms of power ( the state, the family, societal norms, capital) but how to negotiate a life where everything is fluid, where nature herself is not an opposing 'other' but something of which we are but another manifestation. Nature has been completely humanized and we have been completely naturalized. In this post-redemption world we sink back to our animality-not a ferocious assertion of wants and desires, to be sure, but an animal satiation and bovine acceptance of things. Amongst these 'things' we must count ourselves since distinctness is a remnant of our thinking in a finite world. In the Empire of Liberty there is no inward and no outward or, rather, each transmutes into the other. What happens when we lose the very concept and experience of 'limit' and 'frontier'?
Perhaps an equally telling indication of the malaise felt in this world is the inability to imagine immortality. Without the tension necessitated by the pull of the transcendent can there really be any art or even imagination? Marx had thought that we would engage in hobbies but the truth is that unless these are connected to the world they seem like so many trivial pursuits. Technology may solve the problem of labour but it only opens the far deeper and seemingly intractable one of leisure.
Boredom: the unrelenting need for diversions, stimulation, agitation, startling experiences, the exotic. But the flatlands of the spirit are not so compromising. After the difficulty of the mountains, the difficulty of the plains (Brecht). We are "held fast" to the potential of things but view them listlessly. To have moved from use value to the virtual worlds created by imagination and wishes. But a time comes when this lack of contact with reality tires us. In the end of days we will want nothing more than to renounce desire itself, to long again for a return to an inorganic state (thanatos). Inactive, fallow, neutral. Neither animal repose in our being nor a human striving to transcend our horizons , all we have left is an intelligence and a will that is passive and indifferent to everything. The only serious problem now is one of "meaning"...how to kill time.
For the Eloi, who live a life of superabundance amidst an eternal and spotless sunshine, books and civilisation are entirely superfluous. As are memories and regret. They can, without pain or any inclination to act, watch another of their own drown and think nothing of it. It is another moment in the stream of life.
The irony of all this is that it is the self that desired to distance itself from life, to survey it with a god-like mind, cold and objective, that has ended up been swallowed up by it. It is as if the alchemist who had tried to control and manipulate life and nature had himself become nothing but the passing of time.
However gratefully one may welcome the objective spirit-and who has not been sick to death of all subjectivity and its confounded ipsisimosity- in the end one must learn caution...and put a stop to the exaggeration with which the unselfing and depersonalization of the spirit that has recently been celebrated, as if it were the goal in itself, as if it were a salvation and a glorification....The objective man, who no longer curses or scolds like the pessimist, the ideal man of learning in whom the scientific instinct blossoms forth fully after a thousand complete and partial failures-we may say he is a mirror, he is no 'purpose' in himself. Accustomed to prostration before everything that wants to be known, with such desires only as knowing and reflecting imply-he waits until something comes, and then expands himself sensitively, so that even the lightest footsteps and gliding past of spiritual beings may not be lost on his surface and film. Whatever 'personality' he still possesses seems to him accidental, arbitrary, or still oftener disturbing; so much has he come to regard himself as the passage and reflection of outward forms and events. He readily confounds himself with other people, he makes mistakes with regards to his own needs...
His thoughts already rove away to the more general case, and tomorrow he knows as little as he knew yesterday how to help himself. He does not now take himself seriously and devote time to himself. He is serene, not from lack of troubles, but from lack of capacity for grasping and dealing with his trouble. The habitual complaisance with respect to all objects and experiences, the radiant and impartial hospitality with which he receives everything that comes his way, his habit of inconsiderate good nature, of dangerous indifference to Yea or Nay...his mirroring and eternally self-polishing soul no longer knows how to affirm , no longer how to deny.