a new category that is not a category.
Kierkegaard, Genius and Apostle:
The former is an individual genius who expresses or articulates a truth that is greater than himself, his spiritual substance; the Apostle is a function of the Truth, someone who bears witness to an impersonal, transcendental Truth and is chosen by grace. The relation to the self-to our eyes-is contingent. A circle, rather than a diamond.
Appearance and Reality.
...
For what may I hope? (J.Lear):
Radical hope is radical because it is directed toward a future goodness that transcends the current ability to understand what it is. When the cultural world around us collapses, when all that made sense now seems irrelevant, how do we survive, how do we carry on? How do we take forward what we are, what we know, into those unchartered waters? We need to dig deep to find courage , but the very framework that elucidates what is meant by 'courage' has itself been dismantled...
Steadfastness. Latching on to a path, a way, even though unusual in all respects. How can one even imagine such a possibility? Doesn't hope depend on some determinate end, some picture of how things will turn out? This is the problem faced by the Red Man with the destruction of his way of life.
Courage. We are finite -and recognize ourselves as such- but still we reach out to the world in yearning, longing, admiration and desire for that which we take to be valuable, beautiful, and good. This is the world we inhabit.
Socrates. Every soul perceives that the good is some thing but it is perplexed and cannot adequately grasp what it is or acquire the sort of stable beliefs it has about other things.
We reach out for sustenance, to a source of goodness that is beyond us. It was there before we came.
Commitment. The ability to face up to reality . This, only a true individual can do. What resources can one draw on, what experiences when experience itself is empty? How do we go on? But at the same time, new limits to the possibility of experience are opening up.
And yet the Crow remains assured, his dream-vision vouchsafes the possibility that though human beings may be overwhelmed by cultural destruction, the fundamental goodness of the world is secure. Fidelity to his dream would ensure that his people would come through what was the destruction of a telos , the radical discontinuity that announced itself with the coming of the white man. To stray is to lose all...
Only thus could he out-stare the nothingness, face the destruction ahead of him and walk towards it, courageously.
4 comments:
b., insomnia has struck again, and you posted this right about when I woke up this morning. Except reading that with eyes that don't work very well was very bizarre. Yet peaceful, because I feel back asleep and slept soundly.
So, thank you, strangely.
thank you, K.
yesterday I saw a german movie, The Life of Others, that has made me think about your post again, about the fundamental goodness of the world. and especially the last line. a wonderful film, you have to see it. and there was also something else which made me remember you: the Brecht poem about the cloud and the plum tree, they recite it during one scene.
Yes, roxana, seen it! That's where I got the poetry from as well.
I really liked it as well-even though it glosses over the horrors of the system a bit. Yes, the last line!
I'm off for a drive now. Been trying to read some old political economy and can't make head or tail of it!
Hope all is well at your end.
Take care,
b.
fl, yes, reading my stuff with eyes that "don't work very well" is good; but next time try with completely closed eyes..I find that that's the best way! :-)
sleep well!
Post a Comment