The time of necessity has been replaced by the time of possibilities, a random time, open at any moment to the unforeseeable irruption of the new,..., an open process, not determined in advance, in which surprises, unexpected strokes of good fortune and unforeseen opportunities may appear at any moment.
---M. Lowy, cited in Z. Bauman's Consuming Life
A sigh is still a sigh,as time goes by.
Each moment, each second, is a passageway, that takes us there, or brings about a Fall. Mostly you write about what you don't know, but only vaguely intuit. No unified thoughts,or single-minded determination, no unquenchable thirst, no greatness of soul, just second spaces and second thoughts, just floating, without direction, like so much else in your life...
You watch a film, expecting something deep, profound. But isn't that a quick fix, isn't all art? Not the 'thing' itself, the pure unmediated experience, fresh, open, vivid but, instead, a mirage-and what a comforting seduction at that too! Like books, words, sharpness of the mind, people you write to, hopelessly two-dimensional. The illusion that it's there, within reach, without discipline, without seriousness of purpose, without sacrifice; that by simply waiting a time before time will be opened up for you.
Well, the puritanical, the necessary, only has a momentary hold on you. Too abrupt, too harsh, as if only the broken could see. Art is still not a sign that points to reality but a reflection of it that shows. An image is still an image of something and not a random mark.
Some moments are lost; others are regained. Time would never leave us alone. Light and shadows are with us always, the world still 'a tent of scattered stars'.
We are involved in the mystery of lived time, our being here and elsewhere. What is true is 'beyond' but its reflection is also here.
--Iris M.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
i see that your film experience hasn't been very rewarding, i am sorry about that - but this search for the "thing" itself is of course bound to lead to such disappointment - and isn't such search a mirage itself? i'm just asking...
Hello, r.
no, the film experience was actually a very pleasant one! Saw the Burmese Harp. Have you seen it? A bit 'cheesy' at times, but loved the play of shadows and light.
sometimes 'read' like a folktale..when you wanted it to burst into the mythical (if you know what I mean).
Felt that parts needed to be undone, not expressed (the letter and the sea at the end, for example) and there were cliches and a deliberate attempt at the 'poetical' (hmm..if you haven't seen it, it's hard to describe..but there's a seen where a monk is in a statue of the buddha and puts his hands to the light, the open space, as he sees his colleagues. that seemed fake to me.
but no, on the whole I enjoyed the film a lot (even though Nabil didn't).
Yes! The search for the thing-in-itself is , it seems also delusional. firstly, because it's either given or it isn't. Secondly, because one is not a saint; thirdly, as I tried to express here (but not very well, admittedly) there is a *need* for shadows, for 'the second' (not the first), for reflection and reflections. A bit like Siddhartha in Hesse...a return to the transient world, not an escape from it (but hey, you would expect a muslim to say that, wouldn't you!).
On the other hand, got to say that there was something incredibly appealing about the monk in this film, this wandering monk who does not forget home but cannot , for whatever reason, go back there.
In the end, Nabil says it wasn't convincing. [I'm assuming you've seen the film]. Why would he stay.no reason was given. well, yes, I thought that that was just it. such a thing can never be expressed, nor should it. Just *is*.
khair...
How are you? Not writing much nowadays. This blog has become quieter and quieter. Thinking of getting a camera. If I do, I think I'll start another blog and close this one down. I t will just be images. Or maybe not even that. Never was much of a 'word' person (that's more the dougal's territory). My favourite books always have pictures with them.
thanks for the recommendation(s) btw.
what is goodbye in romanian?
b.
huh...saw Donnie Darko at the video store tonight, instantly thought of you. I'll have to think about what r said. Because for me, without the search, life looses it's savour. Mirage is not always bad......if we're not dying of thirst.
b, your blog has been my middle of the night read. Consistently ambiguous, as always. fl
hey, hey, where've you been nikki?!
what's you been upto?
hmm..there are much better things to do in the middle of the night..like eat chocolate cake, sleep...
yes, think you're right..mir-age isn't bad. better than none,for instance.
hope ur well.
warmest greetings! ;-)
b.
i am sorry for coming back so late to answer this - yes, i saw the film and loved it... and i am afraid we have here one of those cases of rare agreement too, because i also think certain parts needed to be left unexpressed - the letter at the end, yes. i was a bit surprised, actually, because that part seems to me totally non-japanese, in its heavy and insistent rhetoric. Ozu wouldn't have done something like that. but no, i wouldn't call it "cheesy". and the rest is so beautiful that i think we can forgive such small exaggerations. of course it is totally poetical and unrealistic, but the story is so filled with so much human warmth and tenderness, and the visuals were so stunning that i was overwhelmed.
sorry for poor Nabil, though :-)
good bye in romannian?
La revedere.
but we often say: pa pa. which was first for children, but now everybody uses it, informally...
:-)
Post a Comment