(Above: one of the rejected submissions for Lenin's mausoleum in Red Square).This was supposed to rival Mecca and Jerusalem. A space that represented the fourth dimension, that was 'beyond' time. The attempt to build heaven on earth resulted in the all-too predictable creation of gulags and varieties of hell. The quest to build the 'New Man' invariably results in cleansing society of the impure and the unbelievers.
Anarchic peoples, like desert nomads, hate and destroy images, and a similar image-breaking streak runs through Russian history…
Malevich was touched by mystical yearnings. In his hands the non-objective canvas became an icon of anarchy and inner freedom: this is what made it dangerous to Marxist materialism. Of his painting Black Square he said he had felt 'black nights within' and a timidity bordering on fear', but as he decided to break with reality and abandon the image: 'a blissful sensation of being drawn into a "desert" where nothing is real but feeling, and feeling became the substance of my life.'
Now this is not the language of a good Marxist, but of Meister Eckhart – or, for that matter, of Mohammed. Malevich's Black Square, his 'absolute symbol of modernity', is the equivalent in painting of the black-draped Ka'aba at Mecca, the shrine in the valley of sterile soil where all men are equal before God. And if this seems far-fetched, I quote the judgement of Andrei Burov, an architect who left the Constructivist Movement: 'There was a strong Muslim influence and orthodox Mohammedanism at that; by way of decoration only clocks and letters were allowed.'
excerpt from "George Costakis: The Story of an Art Collector in the Soviet Union," in What Am I Doing Here? by Bruce Chatwin
No comments:
Post a Comment