Book of the Year: How to Disappear: Notes on Invisibility by Akiko Busch.
This is a wonderful, profound book about: going offline, dropping out, becoming small, forgetting, absences, the ephemeral nature of the self, how things linger even though they're barely visible, erasure (in art, literature), our desire for lightness...on not being too full of yourself. How in art and life and love we're drawn to the invisible, the unsaid -and how they flit in and out of sight. Without forgetting those who are 'disappeared' by illness or cruelty, or neglect.
I picked this book up at random in Foyles because it wasn't put back on the shelf properly (actually, it shouldn't have been on that shelf at all!). What a discovery! Lost and found, our oldest of games: Hunting? Religion?
I loved the bit about finding old signs in a city (on brick walls, say). Lots of those in London. The words faded, faint traces of a bygone era, the products they were once selling now nothing but a distant memory.
In a discussion with Mary Ruefle:
On your deathbed you may remember one word; if you're lucky you may remember one person, one place; but never the whole story, and never in order.
One chapter on Mrs Dalloway (that some of you might like). Personally speaking, I would have gone for Walser or Nescio or Pessoa (or Primo Levi's 'Argon').
A moving chapter on her mother who is losing her memory, identity:
Sometimes, when she sat outdoors in the summer evenings looking at the roses she had planted years before, a calm would visit her. Some of those had grown from cuttings taken from the rose beds her father had planted decades earlier. At the time, I liked to think the pleasure in her face reflected a sense of continuity, some skein of heritage, a few slender threads of family identity that remain unfrayed. And that she was herself again.
But the self is something old and new, derived from earlier parts of life and others
that might have come into being at just that very moment in the dusk.
9 comments:
I was tempted to get this book by your short introduction, b. But then I read some of the reviews. Hmm. Have my doubts.
Quote from the NPR review:
'How to Disappear fails intellectually because Busch never accesses the bodies of work that don't suit her. Her best essays demonstrate the scope of this failure by demonstrating the rigor, both academic and artistic, of which she is capable. They make her sloppiness on other fronts all the more obvious. They also beg the question of why she chose to write about politics, culture, and social media, when these topics seem not to interest her. Worse: They seem invisible to her. Ironically, that invisibility undermines her work.
In How to Disappear, Busch set out to create an antidote to visibility culture, but all she does, in the end, is expose herself.'
Also, if you really wanted to become 'invisible', would you write books about it?? Just asking.......
"the rigor, both academic and artistic, of which she is capable"
Sounds like a harsh schoolteacher! The Amazon reviews are also a mixed bag. I don't think I'd buy the book based on them.
Of course there are weaknesses to the book: the section on Icelandic fairy tales was weak and the bits on science not very impressive. Also, stylistically, some people may find her dipping rapidly in and out of topics (politics/culture/social media) to be equivalent to a lack of "rigour". I don't know, I read it as an extended, poetic essay -and not as a sustained analysis of The Problem of Visibility.
I think her position is bound to rile a lot of people since they've invested so much time and energy in the myth of progress, the myth of technology and so-called 'connectivity'. In a materialistic world in which appearances and frenzied activity are so important the idea that one might want to- in fact, *need* to- take a step away from all of that does indeed sound decidedly "sloppy".
I found a cheap version (8 pounds) of the book. Don't think I'd pay 20 for it. I did, however, just pay 20 pounds for G. Thibon's 'Back to Reality'. And gladly so.
Your question is an old one Celia (Plato's seventh letter?). Religious texts are also centred on the invisible. And some would say that poetry and music carry the invisible with them. So, the book is really about how visibility and invisibility are interwoven with one another- the warp and woof of our existence.
Best wishes,
K.
Of course, we take Amazon reviews lightly - many of them are illiterate, anyway!(Now I'm the 'harsh schoolteacher!)
'The myth of progress': back to Lewis Mumford, one of the few writers I've come across who asked the question: Is growth the only economic model?'I look in vain for any contemporary thinkers who discuss this. You know any? As for 'progress', how much more can we take? Do we need any more choice? And technological progress is proving to be as much a curse as a blessing.
Stepping away from the madness, even briefly, is difficult, although I have friends who make sincere efforts to live 'off grid' as much as possible. I wouldn't say that was 'soppy.' Tim comes pretty close to invisibility these days; he has a mobile phone but he never turns it on and only takes it with him when I insist, so he can let me know if he has an accident. (E.G. when he fell over on ice in the woods last winter and I had to go and rescue him!) He doesn't use social media at all.
Think I'm being cheeky, engaging in exchanges about a book I haven't read on the basis of some reviews!
You say: 'Religious texts are also centred on the invisible. And some would say that poetry and music carry the invisible with them. So, the book is really about how visibility and invisibility are interwoven with one another- the warp and woof of our existence.'
Yes, good comment. I've recently been reading The Kashif al-Mahuub (The Revelation of the Veiled), and other Sufi texts, also hanging out with Senegalese musicians in Brighton who belong to a Sufi sect and convey their message in performances of their sacred music at well-attended gigs. Maybe there's hope for us yet.
Plato? You've got me there! I have been re-reading Homer (in translation, of course) recently - I'd forgotten what a page-turner The Odyssey is. Don't know G. Thibon so am about to look him up.
Greetings
C
Hello, C!
Yes, Wendell Berry is superb and Ivan Illich is one of my intellectual heroes.Both wrote a lot about subsistence. In more recent times, Tim Jackson, 'Prosperity without Growth'. In fact, the idea has always been around (I wrote about it in my own book). Even the great Keynes talked about a time when the relentless pursuit of growth -the 'morbid fascination with money'- would come to an end ('Economic lives of our grandchildren'). This was a theme familiar to some economists (Mills' "stationary state").
Heard that Emily Wilson's new translation is really good. Haven't read it.
Yes, I think there's always hope. What J. Lear in his wonderful book by the same name called 'Radical Hope'.
Thanks for the pointers to other thinkers on growth and its sustainability - or not. Also thanks for book recommendations - will look them up. I'd like to read your book but being, presumably, mainly aimed at academic institutions, it's too costly for ordinary punters. But I'll ask for it next time I'm in the British Library.
Meanwhile, just finished reading latest Dalrymple's book - about the iniquitous East India Company!
That's very sweet of you Celia but to be honest it's not worth reading. And the price..yes, what a rip off! Academic publishing is itself deeply intertwined with capitalism. I did all the editing myself and it has so many mistakes in it that it's embarrassing.
anyway, thinking of writing something non-academic. Maybe self-publish. Let's see.
Senegalese musicians in Brighton! sounds exciting. Have you heard this album, dust to digital (originally recorded by P. Bowles)? Some if it can be heard online if you go to an Adam Shatz review in the NYRB. Shatz is such a good writer! Thanks to him I discovered Mal waldron ("ecstatic minimalism", Shatz calls one of his albums) and Archie Shepp.
Oh, b. You're much too modest. I'm certain that your book is well worth reading - I'll certainly get it at BL. Self-editing is apparently what we're forced to do these days - publishers cost-cutting, of course.Took me days and days to edit and correctly format my paper for the British Quilt Study Group. It's only 6000 words but I don't have the right skills - or patience.
Looking up J. Lear's Radical Hope, I'm reminded to ask you if you've read T.C.McCluhan's Touch the Earth. A Self-Portrait of Indian Existence? Says everything we need to know about colonialism, greed, exploitation and despoiliation of the planet. It was a vade mecum of mine for years and I also used it a lot when I was teaching 'special needs' kids (by which, of course, I mean the economically poor and disaffected as much as the intellectually slow.)
Self-publishing good: Anita succeeded! I've got her book but haven't read it properly yet. It'll make a good follow-up to my current reading about Indian history.
Next time you're in UK look up Bakk Lamp Fall band in Brighton. Very good fun! I'll be down there end of the month but doubt I'll have time to catch up with them.
hello, b
i found the book online! i couldn't resist, it has such a wonderful title - and i mean the subtitle, too: Notes on Invisibility in a Time of Transparency ...
i will certainly take a look at it, it's a topic i find myself more and more preoccupied with recently... and of course your recommendation counts a lot too :-)
yeah, you always seem to disappear from here!
but it's uncanny that we're both thinking about this right now. Really liked the Agnes Martin..found it online as well so will try and read it later.
take care..i'm flying out of here. so, see you on the other shore (hopefully).
Post a Comment