'I don’t want to read about how “we’re all” anything, because wishing away complexity is inadequate and juvenile...
This is the best piece I've read so far. It's so great to believe in something after all these years ("the pen")and you have to wonder if the nihilists aren't succeeding-at least for now- in furthering binary thinking: us and them (forget the East-West Diwan, bro').
It would be interesting to read about the history of satire. Wasn't satire about ridiculing the powerful? So, yes, the Church certainly falls in that category (or at least it used to) and religious authorities, too. I see the courage in satire but I don't see the "generosity" or "humanity" that people are harping on about.
I don't know what 'we are' is in French but I prefer 'I am'.
~~~
The caricature of the jihadi as a medieval throwback, animated by ancient passions, may be comforting to those who would like to wrap themselves in the mantle of civilisation and pose as heirs of Voltaire, but as a way of actually understanding anything, it’s feeble. Understanding is the very least we owe the dead.
The jihadi movement is a thoroughly modern beast, which ironically owes much to the French revolutionary legacy of 1789.
--Hari Kunzru,The Guardian.This is the best piece I've read so far. It's so great to believe in something after all these years ("the pen")and you have to wonder if the nihilists aren't succeeding-at least for now- in furthering binary thinking: us and them (forget the East-West Diwan, bro').
It would be interesting to read about the history of satire. Wasn't satire about ridiculing the powerful? So, yes, the Church certainly falls in that category (or at least it used to) and religious authorities, too. I see the courage in satire but I don't see the "generosity" or "humanity" that people are harping on about.
I don't know what 'we are' is in French but I prefer 'I am'.
~~~







