Friday, January 18, 2008

Wondering

The sheer delight of a child's apperception is based on wonder ; and deny it as we may, knowledge and wonder counteract one another...Now the great and fatal fruit of our civilisation based on knowledge, and hostile to experience, is boredom. All our wonderful education and learning is producing a grand sum-total of boredom. Modern people are thoroughly bored....

---D.H. Lawrence.

We have stuffed ourselves with the thoughts of others, dazed ourselves with books. Been there, read that. Tick. Nothing sinks in. You've been to the finest schools and learnt how to 'critique' things, how to 'think on one's own'. At least that's what you were told, what you were sold. We remember all the wrong things. You see a door and stop to think about it. But only by walking through it do you understand what is inner, what is outer, what is the future, what is the past...

A 'knowledge', an understanding that is not subject to criticism or analysis, that isn't reduced to a 'problem' that has to be resolved, that isn't an 'object' of thought, that isn't 'value neutral' or free of regret...this the modern world cannot abide.

A reflective, self-conscious age..a representative age. One that thinks about life without living it, or that lives it -like a revolutionary-without thinking about it. Skill and inventiveness in constructing fascinating illusions..But the present generation, wearied by its chimerical efforts, relapses into complete indolence.

A reflective age that only seeks mirrors, self-affirmation, that abhors the very possibility of realities beyond the self's narrow confines, that is oblivious of the fact that reason can 'bind' us to one level of reality. Bourgeois sensibilities and a reaction to them is set up: to be or not to be: all or nothing.

The whole age becomes a committee..unable to act decisively, full, bloated with bloodless abstractions and ideas. We have ceased to live soulfully, to live from within. Either the analysis of life or a complete revolt against it in the cult of action and ceaseless agitation is our truth. We fail to see the common thread that unites these disparate approaches but one only has to think that the action is , more often than not, a reaction to stifling boredom, to a leveling down of the spirit, to realise that the desire to flee the heaviness of thought in the leap of action, is , fundamentally, not a desire to re-engage with the world again, but to escape it in whim and fantasy. The world has not known such a radical ascetic as this before...

We are governed by the ethics of the ordinary, the useful. Finally, theoretical discussions are put to one side, they cannot be resolved. Far better to play backgammon. Power, money or happiness are the final arbiters in matters pertaining to truth. And this, it is contended, is a sign of our maturity, our pragmatism! To live without any ideals, without being stopped in one's tracks by the beauty of a face, the sadness of the flowers, the darkness of the trees but, instead, to be acutely aware of our mediocrity and hold that we are nothing but the quintessence of dust, a bare-forked and bewildered animal, subject to the same mechanical forces that distribute atoms throughout the universe. A deformed notion of intelligence lacks beauty. And then we wonder why the modern age is so nihilistic! Having killed 'god' we, we who live in this metaphysical vacuum, now face the greater quandary, wondering how to kill Time before it kills us.

(citations: Kierkegaard: The Present Age)

9 comments:

billoo said...

Celeste writes, Friday, 8th December, 2006:

Alice 'wonders' what happens to us when we die. From the 4 year-old's perspective, SOMETHING has to happen. On a clear night, she seees the night-sky, with innumerable twinkling stars. The stars offer an answer to her question: THAT'S what happens when we die - we become stars! Wonder and knowledge are inseperable to her - but for how long?.

12:50 PM

* said...

that's always one of the things i have never personally experienced or understood, this question of boredom or of how to kill time. Sure, am sometimes bored when i read something dull or such the like, but never really fundamentally bored, for there are so many things i am interested in, want to do, music to listen to, books to read and so on that the day much too often is too short for everything. Once you have given yourself a sense (like dear old NIetzsche said, or also Th. Lessing) after the disappearence of god boredom dissappears and what remains are sad worldly obstacles.

Sadia Ajaz said...

I don't know isn't it possible that to know more is to wonder more?

Having killed 'god' we spend our time either mourning for him or resuscitating him.
Finally we are so much involved in our endeavour that when death comes, most of us wish for more time.

Regards,
Astarte.

* said...

(what i forgot to say) when confronted with the choice backgammon or chess, backgammon should be preferred, for one can even play it when drunk and it is nice and easy and delightful.

billoo said...

"after the disappearence of god boredom dissappears and what remains are sad worldly obstacles."

Not so sure, not so sure.

If that was true then what would explain the frentic search for something to do, the cult of action? After the 'death of god' -or what George Steiner might call 'the transcendent', the pull of what is 'north of the future' -there seems to be little else but the boredom..the fundamental boredom of being unable to live with oneself (or, to put it in other words: the problem of living with *only* oneself).

"Just do it!"

all these activities, all this emphasis on doing (why climb a mountain..because it was 'there'..the world is now an obstacle-and that only).

But didn't nietzsche say: if reality disappears then appearance too loses it charm?

I sometimes wonder if we , like Leonardo, we are interested in everything because we are interested in nothing.

Thanks anyway anton for your thoughtful comments.

Keep well,

b.

billoo said...

Astarte, is it possible?
I don' know. Personally, I think it may be in principle, but in reality I think we stuff ourselves with thoughts and formulas. We are all accountants.

We see a tree and think: 'table'
A child sees a table and wonders why it has "legs".

so, I don't think there is much wonder left. Instead we have to convince ourselves of how clever we are, how much we've read and so on. I think there's a terrible snobbery in this. Nothing is worse than appearing naive (Isaiah Berlin has a great essay on this..do you see the irony!)

I don't know who it is that doesn't wish for my time. Would we be human if we didn't?

Anyway, what wonder can there be when we surround ourselves with man-made objects?



Best wishes,

b.

* said...

hmmnn there is always in the things that you say that make me agree and yet not entirely so. of course on the one hand there is this striving for activity, frantic, like you say and maybe not the most healthiest thing on earth to do - this sort of activity maybe rather a flight from oneself, escaping the boredeom or emptiness of existence. but on the other hand, when you let's say found your vocation - and i don't want to use such a heavily connotated word here, but if you sort of know what to do in life, then the activity becomes Nietzschean dancing. Likely too with phases of boredom but different quality than the first mentioned. As for the worldly obstacles, this was meant not in the sense we should go and strive for domination of the whole world or stupid things like that, but plain practical, money and such that prevent one from doing what one wants.

billoo said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
billoo said...

True Antonia, but do we really know what we want?

I don't think I said one should find one's vocation or know what to do in life. In fact, wonder would mean not 'grasping' for solutions, not always thinking that one must "know". Again, I'm just *suggesting* that the answer isn't always in 'doing' or in closely identifying/defining one's life with what one 'does', with work. Man shall not live by bread alone...

What happens when we reduce everything down to the bread, or the useful?