B___, of course, did not know. And such an explanation did not strike him as a possibility even. It is foreign to a mystified condition of mind to realize of the mystifier that the processes of approving a course suggested by circumstance, and of striking out a course from inner impulse, would look the same in the result. The vast difference between starting a train of events, and directing into a particular groove a series already started, is rarely apparent to the person confounded by the issue.
----fftmc.
~~~
Strings:
Talking to A.I., a string theorist. It seems the latest thing is that the world (universe) is the way it is because that's the way it is. Perfect symmetry already contains chaos. It doesn't matter which way you put it. And there's no real explanation (don't ask for one!). It had to be. Or else there wouldn't be individuals like us, right now, at this very moment, asking: why does it have to be?
What little I understand:
If the sun were a degree closer we'd be consumed by its fire, light...disappear in her flames; if it was a centimeter further away we'd be frozen, our souls hardening, forgetting, our thick fingers fumbling in deep pockets, a quick death due to the lack of heat, light. A word, an image; part of you becomes hard, another softens, melts. There are no more questions.
On earth there are always reminders of this precarious balance: too much, not enough. Some things are infinitely far from us, and at the same time infinitely close.
The world is the world. What sense is in this. One might as well say the queen is the queen!~~~
There's something animal-like in Boldwood's response. That always struck you. The red seal matching the red of his bleary eyes. Red was everywhere. And he's hooked to it. Why this effect on the Puritan soul? His resistance breaking down by the mere mention of a few words, sent only casually. Later, she will wish that the words could be erased, wiped away, but it's too late..they've already lodged deeply in his flesh.
4 comments:
i wonder how they might look, is there an image, a painting for this, words lodged deep in the flesh?
or is it only music which can depict that?
wonderful...
thank you for your comment, Roxana. the internet is down and so it's (been)hard to write.. but that also gives me time to think about your words & deep questions and chew on them a bit.
ah, for once you are chewing on something else than your c.r. :-P
i am sorry to hear you have problems with your internet connection, i was a little upset about it as well, but not any longer, now all is fine.
(deep questions haha)
well, c.r.'s are all i can afford/get my hands on nowadays so...
hmm...do i detect a note of blasphemy in your questioning of the holy c.r.?
yes, this blasted internet is quite irritating..just when you think you're instantly connected to other people-that was the promise, wasn't it?-it turns out that you're not, and you're just in your room on your own.
but yes, sorry, can't respond always to people's comments etc., it's strange, isn't it roxana, how one needs to have daily contact or at least some sort of frivolous chitchat to connect? the utterly mundane ..i've come to treasure that (sounds pretentious, i know, i know).
yes, i think ur right..perhaps images are too 'indirect' and music jumps there straight away ..on the other hand, maybe rothko's black paintings? maybe old boldwood wanted to walk into that darkness, that lasts only a moment, word and flesh...'we want to see the stars *and* feel them'.
hope this gets through coz i can't type it again!
take care,
b.
Post a Comment