Thursday, December 06, 2012

ontological slums

Our language can be seen as an ancient city: a maze of little streets and squares, of old and new houses, and of houses with additions from various periods; and this surrounded by a multitude of new boroughs with straight regular streets and uniform houses.
---Wittgenstein.

I was just saying to little r the other day: you really ought to visit America; Americans love people who talk a lot. 

She's in a "but why?" phase where everything is a question (is this a girl thing?). "But why do Americans say 'tumatoes' and not too-ma-toes..tell them..."

In America you've got the grid, the chessboard...East 35th Street...6th avenue. If you know the co-ordinates, that's where we'll meet; 'X' marks the spot. No names (or not many, anyway); no funny historical figures whose greatness no-one can really remember anyway.

Too many words? Have you ever wondered whether each person just saying a word, in their own way (borrowing the rules and inflection from generations from time out of mind), somehow adds something to the world?

3 comments:

Roxana said...

yes, i have wondered about that - and there is the paradox, isn't it? one adds something new, with each word, said in their own way, and yet it is a word and the saying of it, itself, which has happened a million of times before, countless times... it is beautiful and frightening at the same time...


hi, b :-)

Roxana said...

not related, or perhaps it is (and i know your interest for this kind of drawings):

http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=59395#.UMKF5Gfvjnd

billoo said...

why do you say it's frightening, roxana?

thanks for the picture! :-)
I was expecting something else.

Keep well,

b.