The need to press on and ignore F.R.'s view that Islam is a pagan religion (there is a whole history to this, the idea that Islam is nothing more than a corruption of the true faith, a set of borrowings). This hostility is not altogether surprising when you think of Islam's traditional aversion to the idea that any one people or religion has an exclusive claim to the truth: no eternally fixed "chosen people" and no salvation through Christ alone.
If one has been brought up to believe that you have a monopoly on the truth (and in practice Muslims are as guilty of this as anyone else) then the orthodox Islamic view that every people, community or "civilization" had its prophet can jar and be profoundly psychologically disturbing.
Let's leave the last word to Putnam:
"The most unfortunate aspects of the Star of Redemption are, in fact, its polemical remarks about religions other than these two [Christianity and Judaism]...I find this aspect of the Star depressing..."
But no, let's press on or the day will never start...
_______________
It is a sad fact to contemplate the losing of one's religion (if one still takes religion seriously, that is). Over the years a number of good friends have-understandably-felt themselves increasingly ill at ease with their faith (or, more accurately, with the way it is expressed all around them in its political, cultural and social guise). Understandably, I say, because when one sees all the pettiness, hatred, ignorance and violence associated with religion in its current manifestation any sensitive soul and any reflective person would recoil, in good faith, at the horror that is unfolding before him or her.
And yet, if we move beyond current events and probe a bit deeper there is another source of unease and I think it's this: much of the modern world has grown from roots that have little to do with Islam (this is a view that is in stark contrast to the Allama's lectures). The political and economic systems, for instance, do not seem to bear much resemblance to the religious world-view. And, the disjunction between an unbridled capitalism and disdain for the environment and a religious sensibility (in general) over the last century stands as an even more glaring example of the specific incompatibility between Islam and modernity.
I mention all of this in relation to F.R. because I want to ask: are the Muslims the new Jews? The point of this question is not to neglect the continued existence of anti-semitism or to draw any firm historical parallels, and even less is it to harp on about victim-hood. Instead, can we ask this question in the light of the Rohingya and the long history of Islamophobia, in light of what is seen as the pressing problem of "assimilation" and integration, the radical 'othering' of Muslims, the strangers in our midst whose values are "not like ours".
__________________
"If there were five seconds of love, understanding, and truth, what would the rest of the day be like?"
"The Middle Ages are the East's revenge on antiquity for Alexander's conquests."
"For what is the use of the most perfect organization of Jews if there are now Jews left to be "organized"?"
"I make excerpts, collate, I experience commas, make tracings..."
"An entire train of thought was concluded with a gesture."
~~~~
In the light of experience.
In light of.
In. Light. Of.
Our love of, the necessity of, life lived in darkness. Our life is just as much structured by the light of what we do not and cannot experience.
~~~~~
"I too am now anxious for a furlough (bath, carpet, sofa, chair, Beethoven variations, old manuscripts, which again interest me."
"I detest sets and love the single book."
~~~~
F.R., growing up with the usual antisemitism, the pressures (however subtle or gross they may have been) to conform to "Germany" or "Christianity" turns to what? What resources does he draw upon?
There is something utterly fascinating about Rosenzweig. His Understanding the Sick and the Healthy has some lovely writing. But his face is too harsh. I don't know why I set such great store by the looks of a person.
At Herr Lukas's place for dinner over the weekend. He recalled to me, with some glee (perhaps pride would be a better word) that he had told the students in his class that Abraham didn't actually exist. Learn to be critical (by which he really means: stop believing). It seems as if there are some people hell-bent on making sure the kids lose their religion, just as there are other forces at work trying to convince them to adopt the harshest, sternest and most unforgiving version of it.
If one has been brought up to believe that you have a monopoly on the truth (and in practice Muslims are as guilty of this as anyone else) then the orthodox Islamic view that every people, community or "civilization" had its prophet can jar and be profoundly psychologically disturbing.
Let's leave the last word to Putnam:
"The most unfortunate aspects of the Star of Redemption are, in fact, its polemical remarks about religions other than these two [Christianity and Judaism]...I find this aspect of the Star depressing..."
But no, let's press on or the day will never start...
_______________
It is a sad fact to contemplate the losing of one's religion (if one still takes religion seriously, that is). Over the years a number of good friends have-understandably-felt themselves increasingly ill at ease with their faith (or, more accurately, with the way it is expressed all around them in its political, cultural and social guise). Understandably, I say, because when one sees all the pettiness, hatred, ignorance and violence associated with religion in its current manifestation any sensitive soul and any reflective person would recoil, in good faith, at the horror that is unfolding before him or her.
And yet, if we move beyond current events and probe a bit deeper there is another source of unease and I think it's this: much of the modern world has grown from roots that have little to do with Islam (this is a view that is in stark contrast to the Allama's lectures). The political and economic systems, for instance, do not seem to bear much resemblance to the religious world-view. And, the disjunction between an unbridled capitalism and disdain for the environment and a religious sensibility (in general) over the last century stands as an even more glaring example of the specific incompatibility between Islam and modernity.
I mention all of this in relation to F.R. because I want to ask: are the Muslims the new Jews? The point of this question is not to neglect the continued existence of anti-semitism or to draw any firm historical parallels, and even less is it to harp on about victim-hood. Instead, can we ask this question in the light of the Rohingya and the long history of Islamophobia, in light of what is seen as the pressing problem of "assimilation" and integration, the radical 'othering' of Muslims, the strangers in our midst whose values are "not like ours".
__________________
"If there were five seconds of love, understanding, and truth, what would the rest of the day be like?"
"The Middle Ages are the East's revenge on antiquity for Alexander's conquests."
"For what is the use of the most perfect organization of Jews if there are now Jews left to be "organized"?"
"I make excerpts, collate, I experience commas, make tracings..."
"An entire train of thought was concluded with a gesture."
~~~~
In the light of experience.
In light of.
In. Light. Of.
Our love of, the necessity of, life lived in darkness. Our life is just as much structured by the light of what we do not and cannot experience.
~~~~~
"I too am now anxious for a furlough (bath, carpet, sofa, chair, Beethoven variations, old manuscripts, which again interest me."
"I detest sets and love the single book."
~~~~
F.R., growing up with the usual antisemitism, the pressures (however subtle or gross they may have been) to conform to "Germany" or "Christianity" turns to what? What resources does he draw upon?
There is something utterly fascinating about Rosenzweig. His Understanding the Sick and the Healthy has some lovely writing. But his face is too harsh. I don't know why I set such great store by the looks of a person.
At Herr Lukas's place for dinner over the weekend. He recalled to me, with some glee (perhaps pride would be a better word) that he had told the students in his class that Abraham didn't actually exist. Learn to be critical (by which he really means: stop believing). It seems as if there are some people hell-bent on making sure the kids lose their religion, just as there are other forces at work trying to convince them to adopt the harshest, sternest and most unforgiving version of it.
3 comments:
It seems that Rosenzweig's opinionated writings on Islam are now largely embarrassing - and reflective of a bias ( Hegel wrote of Islam as triumphant Judaism ) although he was not a Zionist and his writings on religion when he does not mention Islam always mean Islam in the background. It would be useful to know how he arrived at his conclusions as it seems there is a lot of a priori assumption making in his opinions. Did he know Arabic and did he actually read the Qu'ran? To some of us, it seems unlikely. However, his Star is a book worth reading and then ignoring ( most books can be read and then ignored, bar a few )
I was frittering my time away and found your reference to his Star.
Best wishes
Salamat Ali Naqshbandi
Thank you Salamat for dropping in and for your very thoughtful comment.
He does say at one stage that he was learning Arabic. Have no idea of his proficiency.
Have to say: I find the standard view that the God of Islam is supposed to have an arbitrary will ( repeated by ratzinger) quite pointless.
I think m.Asad. in road to mecca, says something quite interesting: could the west ever forgive God for ' sending down' another religion? How to explain the ' success of Islam? Is there a deep historical mental ( spiritual ) block when it comes to Islam? ( r.w. southern has a small but fascinating book on this).
Khair...
Best,
K.
it is interesting that perhaps the notion propagated by Ratzinger is deliberate? the notion of a non-mystical Islam and arbitrariness of God is a deliberate view propagated to spread a notion of Islam that sits well with current political and violent events ( after all, all violence is political, what else is it? ) because mystical trends are not the forte of any one faith or ideology but well known in Islam too.
Asad may be right; the notion of abrogation of preceding revelations is not however an imperative within the Qu'ran - addition to, verifying but not nullifying all previous commandments to our understanding ( although mainstream Islamic opinion might suggest to themselves otherwise ) is a vital strand within revelatory hermeneutics.
the analysis of current events follows a topical beat, dictated by populist interpretations, hostage to academic malaise and the rule is run by academics who wield power perhaps( or serve power ) the ineffable is however not subject to their fancies, it defies them.
I think the mental block you refer to is deliberate. if it is because of non-understanding, then it is frightening.
Salamat
Post a Comment